Yesterday
I was driving back to Dumfries having collected some donated food
when......
Actually,
that really isn't enough. Well, is it? No it isn't. Try again
Frankland.
Yesterday
I was driving back to Dumfries having picked up seventy packs of
delicious sliced ham which are donated to us each and every week by the
good folk at Brown Brothers in Kelloholm.
Much
better. Any half decent foodbank must never neglect the hand that feeds.
Anyway.
A few miles out of Thornhill I hit the tail end of a wagon convoy and
I just couldn't be bothered with it. So I turned right onto a back
road based alternative route which I knew full well would take ten minutes
longer, wagons or no wagons. It would just feel like less. With better
views. And I am lucky enough not to be beholden to one of the new
digital delivery outfits which expect you never waste so much as a
nano second of time or else.
So
it was over the swollen river Nith and straight west through a
curtain of rain to the village of Penpont. Somewhere either side were
the hills of the Southern Uplands, but a settled grey mist put paid to
my chances of getting a look at them. Wet cattle sulked on the other
side of wet hedges. And the temperature readout on the dashboard said it was a mere 8 degrees. At ten thirty. As in batten down the hatches
because the long winter is a coming.
As
I entered the quietness of Penpont, I once again celebrated not working
for a slave driving outfit as I was able to something I have been meaning to
do for a while. I drew up by the war memorial. You can see it at the
top of the page. Yeah? So I guess you can see why I drew up. It is a truly
beautiful thing to commemorate something truly awful. I didn't want
to merely take a moment to look at it. I also wanted to count the
names.
There
are forty.
Does
that seem a lot? In some ways, maybe it doesn't. Forty souls of
Penpont in the midst of a carnage which did for more than ten
million. But to look at the number forty in that way would be
entirely the wrong context. Well I think it would be, and I'm the one
who's writing the blog.
I
found the right context a hour or so later.
Google.
'Penpont;
Wikipedia.
A village in the Southern Uplands. Some co-ordinates.
Population
400.
Would
the population have been much higher in 1914? Maybe, but I doubt if
it would have been much. So 40 dead men represented 10% of the
village's population. Or 20% of the village's male population. Or
nearly 50% of the working age male population.
But
that is only half the story, for there will have been many names which
never made it onto the memorial. The wounded ones. The broken ones.
The amputated and the blinded. The ones who were driven into madness. More
Google told me that for every dead British soldier in the Great War
there were two and a half who were seriously injured.
Christ.
A
hundred wounded guys to go with the forty dead guys.
So
a hundred and forty dead or wounded men from a small Scottish village
in the Southern Uplands that was probably home to not many more than 400
souls.
35%.
And
yet Google also told me the percentage of dead and wounded in
the United Kingdom as a whole was 7%. A mere fifth of what happened to the men of Penpont.
I
cannot begin to get my head around what such a vast loss must have
felt like in such a small community. I have witnessed at first hand
the gaping hole the 96 victims of Hillsborough tore in the community
of Liverpool. Those 96 dead people represent the greatest tragedy
suffered by the UK in many, many years. And yet they make up less
than 0.001% of the population of the city they hailed from. Penpont
had to deal with 35% of its population not coming home or coming
home all broken up.
Penpont
is unusual only in the beauty of its memorial. The same story is told
by memorials the length and breadth of Scotland. I guess I notice
this because I was born and bred south of the border where the
memorials can be every bit as beautiful, and yet they only ever hold a
fraction of the names.
In
the light of this, is it really all that surprising Scotland has
struggled at times over the last century. Considering how many Scots
were fed into the mincing machine of the Western Front it is a wonder
the country managed to function at all. The fact that a nation which
was home to 8% of the population of the UK contributed 25% of the
1914/18 death toll really should still be an open wound. But it isn't
of course. Instead it is just another of those quiet, hushed up facts
of the British State.
I
have no doubt London will have a hundred an one explanations as to
how this thing happened. And I have no doubt they will have a whole
bunch of professors with lots of letters after their names who will
come up with lots of reasons as to why such a disproportionate number of Scots met their maker in the killing fields of France. And I guess we will probably buy what they
are selling us. We usually do.
In
1967 it emerged that the exact same two numbers had come together in
America. Black people made up 8% of the population of the United
States. However black soldiers made up 25% of the death toll in
Vietnam. When the stats leaked out, black people were not best amused.
They were pretty convinced young black soldiers were being used as
cannon fodder from the Mekong Delta in the south to the DMZ in the
north.
They
kicked off. Big style. And Detroit burned for a whole long, hot summertime week.
I
guess it is good we are better at taking it on the chin. When all is
said and done, setting cities alight is seldom a good look. What
really gets my goat are the smug, cocky voices from studios in
Westminster who gleefully explain why Scotland is far too pathetic to
manage on its own. I guess it is what you get in return for shedding
oceans of blood in the sacred name of King, country and Empire. With
so many laid to rest under the fields of France and Belgium, the fact
Scotland is where it is at today it is a bloody miracle. Maybe such
an achievement could be seen as proof positive we are a nation who
can get up and dust ourselves down no matter how hard we fall. Not
capable of being independent? Oh really?
I
turned left in the centre of the village and turned south. After couple
of a miles and I drew up alongside a rather derelict looking
building. Peeling paint and a plaque on the wall commemorating the fact
that in 1840 a guy called Kirkpatrick McMillan only went and invented
the bicycle. Right there. In this old blacksmiths shop. In Kiermill.
In the Southern Uplands. In Scotland.
I
mean, for Christ's sake. I guess there are a few bigger inventions
than the bike, but not very many. Just think of the hundreds and
hundreds of millions who have used a bike to get from A to B in the
176 years worth of human history since Kirkpatrick McMillan came up
with the idea.
Thought
of in Scotland. Invented in Scotland. Made in Scotland. This small wet and wild place in the grey north of the world. The place which is
deemed to be so pathetic that we can't even think of managing on
our own. Because we are all fat and sick and idle and communist and
drunk and violent and addicted to fried everything. Subsidy junkies.
Schemies.
OK.
We might have invented the bike. OK. We might have offered up a third
of our young men to the slaughter. But never mind all that. Let's
forget all about all that. Instead let's take the piss on the front
pages of the Express and the Mail. Let's mock and deride like we once
mocked and derided inferior blacks and Irish. Let's hang onto our
last scrap of significant Empire like a spoilt child clinging to a
stolen toy.
So.
Yesterday was two
villages on a rainy morning on the very cusp of Autumn. Two villages
and way too many ghosts and seventy packs of ham all boxed up in the
back of the van.
Brilliant writing Mark, and next time I buy cooked ham I'll get some Brown Brothers.
ReplyDeleteWhen you think about what a stupid pointless war the First Wold War was, it makes you even angrier. They weren't fighting fascism. They were fighting for who/which was the most important empire.
ReplyDeleteI'm anti violence. Always have been; always will be. Never rioted. Never even been in a fight.
Sometimes though, I think that Brits (all of us) are just a wee bit too accepting.
We tend to put up with whatever shit they throw at us. We moan and complain and then get on with it.
They (the establishment) like to think that this is a mark of strength in our character; one of the (many?) things that make Brits infinitely superior to every race under the sun (except, of course, Americans). (Obviously there is not hint of petty nationalism in this presumption...that's only for Scots nationalists!)
I wonder if we were a little more like the French, and kicked off when they shit on us, maybe they wouldn't shit quite so often or in quite such prodigious volume.
Excuse the language!
Well said Tris!
DeleteThanks Gary... As Mark said, I needed to get that off my chest. Mrs may probably noted my name though!
DeleteThat almost sounds as if you were getting something off your chest Tris!
ReplyDelete:)
ReplyDeleteYou know it Mark!
The Scots, Irish, Welsh and soldiers from every part of 'The Empire' have been cannon fodder in every war Britain has fought for centuries Mark, they have underpinned every victory in every field of warfare going, it's England who have been subsidised, by dead and wounded galore,keeping the Great British State alive and kicking. That's before we even get to the brain trust we've given them, and by extension the world. Subsidy Junkies? Pffft, do me a favour!
ReplyDeleteDelighted to have found this blog with such superb writing.
ReplyDeleteI look for and read all inscriptions on war dead. All over and all around Scotland.
ReplyDeleteI also visit Commonwealth Graveyards in Scotland and am amazed at the amounts of double or multi deaths in the one family. It really astounds me. I am a ex soldier so I feel it very much .All Scots squaddies know they`re cannon fodder and I was one of the men who fired the cannons, not in war thankfully..
Penpont's unusual in quite a few ways. Great blog.
ReplyDeleteI can remember those riots, but I can't recall any mention of the reason. Thank you for this piece, it puts so much in context.
ReplyDeleteI can remember those riots, but I can't recall any mention of the reason. Thank you for this piece, it puts so much in context.
ReplyDeleteThanks Mark. Another top notch piece that I'm sharing far and wide.
ReplyDeleteWhat a coincidence...this article came out right after this blog was published.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-south-scotland-37504991
its past time someone highlighted this so scots can at least begin to see through the bull.
ReplyDeleteas for the numbers of dead scots I believe it may well have been Teresa May who claimed (before her ascension to PM)the scots wanted to be in the front line. Strange because I don't remember ever hearing of any general asking such a question.
I am Irish. I have always been so grateful that my country managed to remain neutral through two world wars. With regard to the disproportionate Scottish losses, I believe that that the genius of empire is the ability to have others do the fighting and dying. In 1759 (? I think) during the battle of Québec, General Wolfe was told that his army had suffered heavy losses. He askes who they were. When told that they were Scottish Highlanders, he said "Then that's no great Mischief." Enough said.
ReplyDeleteI'm mickmacnamara@gmail.com
DeleteI enjoyed reading your piece, very sad, but very enlightening, hope you don't mind me sharing!
ReplyDeletedickiedondow@yahoo.co.uk